Mistaken Identity May Cost Angler $1,500

A fisherman who caught a huge fish in Vermont’s White River will likely pay a $1,500 fine and lose his fishing license for three years because he says he incorrectly identified an endangered Atlantic salmon as a brown trout.

Ryan McCullough of Bethel, Vermont, was fishing downstream of the federal fish hatchery in Stockbridge on July 25 when he hooked and landed a 9.5-pound fish that measured 31½ inches long. He misidentified it as a brown trout and kept it. He even notified the local newspaper which published a photo photo of the big fish.

Fish and Wildlife Service biologists who were studying Atlantic salmon that had migrated upstream in the Connecticut River to spawn noticed the photo in the paper and at the same time discovered one of two salmon with radio transmitters they had been monitoring in the White River was now transmitting  from dry land in Bethel.

Fisheries biologists who had previously put radio-transmitters in Atlantic salmon that had migrated upstream in the Connecticut River to spawn noticed the photo. They also discovered one of the two salmon they were monitoring in the White River was now transmitting its signal from dry land in Bethel.

According to the Rutland Herald, State Game Warden Keith Gallant turned up the missing salmon in McCullough’s freezer. McCullough was issued a citation to appear in Windsor Superior Court on Sept. 27.

  • Jestin

    Hmm, I'd like to see a photo of this fish. Browns and Atlantic Salmon can appear very similar. If I were him, I'd have its DNA examined and try to prove it isn't a pure Atlantic.

  • PJ
  • Bill S.

    Definitely not a Brown! Like those clothes.

  • Intelligent angler

    Yeah, that definitely looks like a brown to me… definitely not. Really people. Good luck getting around the radio tag with the DNA analysis.

  • Nick C.

    Yeah, …. fine the poor guy who's not an ichthyologist because he made a bad call on the state's science project. His intention was honorable. Otherwise he wouldn't have called the paper for a picture. Don't fine the corrupt commercial enterprise and big business who caused the disappearance of the salmon in the first place. If a judge lets this stick, then folks, we all have ourselves to blame. Unbelievable. And you folks who are judging the guy….. give it a rest. I'd like to read your resumes from afield. By the way, I am an ichthyologist.

  • Jestin

    Yeah, not a brown. Dude could probably use a little educating rather than slapping him with a big fine and thinking that will take care of it. I know its up to him, but fines only do so much.

  • Colinb

    Why anyone would want to keep any fish in that condition beats me, unless to put it out of it's agony?

    The tail says it's a salmon!

  • Kody B.

    The two species are very similar looking, especially when browns get old and begin to lose their color. I personally think that it should just be marked as a warning for him. There was no way he could have known there was a radio transmitter planted in the fish.

  • Adam C

    I'm guessing if you look in the rule book in Vermont there is a section on identifying salmonoid species. But, the fine does seem pretty hefty for an honest mistake. Look at the guy, he doesn't seem to be someone pounding the rivers all the time. Probably only fishes a few times a year.

  • http://www.howtoknowwhenyouareinlove.info he is in love with you

    Attractive element of content. I just stumbled upon your website and in accession capital to say that I get actually loved account your blog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing on your feeds or even I achievement you get admission to consistently quickly.