January 02, 2016
A workhorseÂ attractor nymph gets even better
[caption id="attachment_3789" align="aligncenter" width="550"] Photo Jeff Simpson[/caption]
The most successful fly patterns appeal to trout in diverse ways. Take the Adams, for example. Its hallmark is that it appears as two or more bug species at once. It was originally developed as a caddis pattern but fly fishers have used it as a mayfly imitation for decades.
Why does it work so well? Likely it's because the Adams appears like several different insects at the same time.
Many other successful patterns we've come to know and love work for the same reason. The Pheasant-tail Nymph mimics dark mayfly nymphs of any species. The Stimulator simulates several species of stoneflies, caddis, and even grasshoppers. The more species a particular pattern can mimic the more successful it is.
Years ago, as I progressed from the attractor-fly stage toward the match-the-hatch stage, I began reading entomology books by authors such as Dave Hughes, Swisher and Richards, and Ralph Cutter. As I read Cutter's book Sierra Trout Guide, I noticed a recurring theme. It seemed that whether it was a stonefly, mayfly, or caddis, he frequently recommended the same nymph: the Bird's Nest.
I became a little conflicted, as I was now trying to step up to what I thought was the next level of fly fishing (matching the hatch) but my new fly fishing sensei (Ralph Cutter) was suggesting just the opposite. The Bird's Nest may be the most generic nymph pattern ever tied, but
because he was the guru and I the student, I decided to try it.
I soon discovered that the Bird's Nestâ€”like the Adams, Pheasant Tail and Hare's Earâ€”is not merely an attractor pattern. It matches several different aquatic insects and it always works because it just looks right. You can also tailor the Bird's Nest colors to more closely match specific insects.
The Bird's Nest possesses the perfect silhouette of most aquatic nymphs, and the soft translucent materials shimmer with the slightest current, giving the illusion of life. Maybe best of all, the thick buggy dubbing provides the fish with an oral sensation that tells it to grab and hold on rather than to reject.
[caption id="attachment_3791" align="aligncenter" width="550"] Photo Jeff Simpson[/caption]
Originator Cal Bird tied the Bird's Nest in two colorsâ€”the natural gray-brown color found in fly shop bins today, and what he called "spectral." The spectral Bird's Nest used a mix of guard hairs died in both the primary and secondary colors of the color wheel. His theory was that the fish would see at least one of these colors regardless of the light situation at any particular time.
Despite Bird's specific recommendation of spectral dubbing, in actual practice he used whatever materials he had on hand. One of his tying friends said that the only thing consistent about the Bird's Nest was the inconsistency.
My only critique about the Bird's Nest is that the original version doesn't carry enough weight to get to the bottom of moderately deep or swift holding water. My Depth Charge Bird's Nest eliminates this weakness by stacking double tungsten or other beads up front in addition to a tungsten wire underbody. The Depth Charge version sinks like an anchor, and it's especially suited for seeking out large trout in deeper water. The regular version is better for shallow-water nymphing and as a dropper under a dry fly.
Greg Vinci is a contract fly tier with Umpqua Feather Merchants.